In Reply to: To brainsturgeon... posted by Mercury_Atlantis (Gold Member) on August 25, 2001 at 00:43:11:
Actually, I've been so busy at my new job these last few weeks that, when I do have the time to work at the site, I'm rushed and can't pay much attention to details. And most of the time has been going to Literati anyway. And I haven't looked here in quite some time or I would have responded sooner.
But, having said that, you are accurate with both of your points. It never occurred to me that:
1) I needed 100 games played or I couldn't be an HOF candidate
2) Lauwass broke a rule
Thanks for bringing that stuff up. I took my vote away and emailed the Pyrops about the lauwass incident.
: Call me naive, mean, big cheap talker, whatever, but come on!!!
: A vote for you in the Hall of Fame should NOT be valid, you haven't "played" 100 Pyramid games.
: Don't get me wrong...
: You deserve a lot of credit for succeeding with the Pyramids and you've had quite some forces against you, you definitely are responsable for creating the Pyramid and it was mostly you.
: But sometimes it hurts me to see how you allow certain rules to be broken on certain occasions at pyramid. (Another example, ed_the_vet posted something about how Rule 1 is strictly enforced. A week later, old school friend Lauwass changes his name to Scacco_Matto where he jokes at and with this honourable player's name, and nothing happens to him).
: And then I get kicked from pyramid for bringing up injustices like that.
: Again... You truly ARE omnipotent in pyramid, it shows in bended rules.
: PS. I don't mean to hate you or start another stupid pointless fight with you, but sometimes, Grrrr, I just can't watch things like these go by so quietly.