Re: Games.com

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Forum ]

Posted by Nascar24Grl (Platinum) (Ranked 6 on Backgammon (Games.com) Ladder) on April 13, 2005 at 16:54:51:

In Reply to: Re: Games.com posted by ZaP on April 13, 2005 at 15:37:27:

TY for the info and yeah we were told that we had 50 days before purging but that was more than 30 days ago and some are creeping closer to the time....I know other games were given more days before purging and that was extended for them but why are gammon players not being given the same consideration? I can understand prioritizing which games are brought back and in what order....but if its gonna take months and months to bring them back up, why are we only given 50 days before purging happens? WHY arent all games given the same safety time? I heard that milleborne has been given more than 350 days but I dont know that to be a fact.....if milleborne is one of the first back and they have a yr of safety, why dont the others?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Ladder:
Ladder Name:
Password:
Password saved if checked

Subject:

Comments:
: TY for the info and yeah we were told that we had 50 days before purging but that was more than 30 days ago and some are creeping closer to the time....I know other games were given more days before purging and that was extended for them but why are gammon players not being given the same consideration? I can understand prioritizing which games are brought back and in what order....but if its gonna take months and months to bring them back up, why are we only given 50 days before purging happens? WHY arent all games given the same safety time? I heard that milleborne has been given more than 350 days but I dont know that to be a fact.....if milleborne is one of the first back and they have a yr of safety, why dont the others?

Optional Link URL:

Link Title:

Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Forum ]