Re: Good New/Bad News ;-}~

Posted by FauxMan (Platinum) (Ranked 5 on Backgammon (Games.com) Ladder) on March 23, 2005 at 13:29:14:

In Reply to: Re: Good New/Bad News posted by ZaP on March 23, 2005 at 10:25:40:

WEATHER WE SAHRE A LOBBY OR NOT... IT IS BETTER THEN, HAVING NO LOBBY AT ALL TO PLAY IN... JUST TO PLAY IN A TOURNEY, TO SHARE IS NOT BAD... CASSES DOES NOT HAVE A LOBBY AT THE TIME, TO RUN A TOURNEY IN... IT IS GREAT THAT ALL KEEP TRYING TO FIND A PLACE... SOMETHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN SOON... KEEP TRYING AND WE WILL BE PLAYING IN A TOURNEY SOON... WEATHER ITS AT GAMES, OR A DIFFERENT SITE... WHEN AND IF GAMES GOES BACK UP, WE CAN RETURN THEN ;-}~ KEEP THE FAITH AND LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND A PLACE... I WILL JOIN AND PLAY IN YOUR TOURNEY THERE! ! ! YOU CAN PLAY IN MORE THE ONE SITE AND HAVE FUN STILL... KEEP LQQKING...
LA YA THE FAUX MAN
X O X O X O X O X O X O X
(hell I may even host if they let me) ;-}~~~~~

: that is probably why they can and we can't nas. My league is different in that anybody can create a league. With so many leagues running same games, there are limited lobbies. In myleague, you can share lobbies where two (or more) leagues can be in the same lobby under certain restrictions. Case's leagues are "professionaly" operated in that no random person can create a league, all leagues are created by Case's itself. Since there are less leagues per game it allows spreading out of lobbies. I don't think two Case's (igl.net/??) leagues can share one lobby which is why you only see one Gamesback league - there is only one backgammon lobby. I don't know if that's really how it works, it's just the way I'd expect it to work. But nevertheless, no matter how it works, the decision to temporarily share a lobby is probably not up to any td or HTD, etc.

: Again, not sure if this is all right, it's just a theory I've gathered ;)