Re: OPS - ranking

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Forum ]

Posted by MBusLady (Platinum) (Ranked 6 on Canasta (IPlay) Ladder) on July 06, 2002 at 22:56:46:

In Reply to: Re: OPS - ranking posted by shyeagle (LeadOp) on July 06, 2002 at 07:22:00:

I understand the reasons for ops not to be in top 25 on the ladder they are an op on (even though I disagree when the ladder is so small). BUT, I think the new ruling that cases ops can't be in the top 25 on ANY (EVEN ones they are not ops on)Cases ladder is absurd!!! Op's should be able to compete like everyone else on ladders they are not op's on, after all they need releases and feel good's too!!! I truly feel that Cases will eventually regret this decision when op's start quitting. :o(

: Hi Aubster
: As a ladder op it is our duty to see that ladder rules are followed by all users. If a ladder op is in the top 25 and has to rung a user it can be beneficial to to the ladder op. It can be argued that some ladder ops could abuse their abilities to raise their own standings and to keep themselves in a hank ranking position.
: By not allowing lader ops in the top 25 you take away the temptation for the ladder op to abuse the .
: I hope this helps to explain things.
: ShyEagle

: : Hi Folks, i would like to know why an "op" can't be in the top 25. Aren't they players just like those of us who are not ops? They don't have an inside track to the cards do they? j/k
: : I would not want to become an "op" knowing that I can not play in the case lobby like a regular player and try to get up the ladder. What would be the sense in playing.
: : I'm sure there is a very reasonable sensible explanation, so that is why i'm asking.
: : thank you much :):)

Follow Ups:

Re: OPS - ranking shyeagle (LeadOp) 08:57:08 7/07/02 (2)
- Re: OPS - ranking MBusLady (Platinum) 13:02:53 7/07/02 (1)
  - Re: OPS - ranking mrskoala (OpManager) 06:55:05 7/09/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Ladder:
Ladder Name:
Password:
Password saved if checked

Subject:

Comments:
: I understand the reasons for ops not to be in top 25 on the ladder they are an op on (even though I disagree when the ladder is so small). BUT, I think the new ruling that cases ops can't be in the top 25 on ANY (EVEN ones they are not ops on)Cases ladder is absurd!!! Op's should be able to compete like everyone else on ladders they are not op's on, after all they need releases and feel good's too!!! I truly feel that Cases will eventually regret this decision when op's start quitting. :o( : : : Hi Aubster : : As a ladder op it is our duty to see that ladder rules are followed by all users. If a ladder op is in the top 25 and has to rung a user it can be beneficial to to the ladder op. It can be argued that some ladder ops could abuse their abilities to raise their own standings and to keep themselves in a hank ranking position. : : By not allowing lader ops in the top 25 you take away the temptation for the ladder op to abuse the . : : I hope this helps to explain things. : : ShyEagle : : : Hi Folks, i would like to know why an "op" can't be in the top 25. Aren't they players just like those of us who are not ops? They don't have an inside track to the cards do they? j/k : : : I would not want to become an "op" knowing that I can not play in the case lobby like a regular player and try to get up the ladder. What would be the sense in playing. : : : I'm sure there is a very reasonable sensible explanation, so that is why i'm asking. : : : thank you much :):)

Optional Link URL:

Link Title:

Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Forum ]