In Reply to: Actually that is a bad translation... posted by XJustice1 on September 13, 2001 at 02:12:32:
Rumor Watch: Terrorist Attacks on U.S.
Part 2: Did Nostradamus Predict the Tragedy?
More of this Feature
• Part 1: Rumor Watch
I have no doubt that some will seriously claim that the 16th-century prophet Nostradamus predicted the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks in his writings — such claims follow virtually every modern disaster — but one quatrain already being circulated under Nostradamus' name is demonstrably bogus.
Example:
"In the City of God there will be a great thunder,
Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb",
The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"
- Nostradamus 1654
Unfortunately, Nostradamus died in 1566, so it's rather unlikely he wrote this passage in 1654. It's not to be found in his published oeuvre. It's a hoax.
The verse apparently originated on a Web page entitled "A Critical Analysis of Nostradamus," written several years ago by a student named Neil Marshall. Marshall made up the quatrain to demonstrate — quite ironically, in light of how it is now being misused — that the writings of Nostradamus are so cryptic that they can be interpreted to mean almost anything.
Oh, and of all the possible candidates for a "City of God" in the modern world, shouldn't New York City rate among the least likely?
: Century 10, Quatrain 72
: Here's the first 2 lines of that particular prediction:
: L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois,
: Du ciel viendra vn grand Roy d'effrayeur:
: Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
: Auant apres Mars regner par bon-heur.
: Translation:
: In the year 1999 and seven months
: The Great King of Terror will come from the sky,
: He will bring back to life the great king of Angolmois.
: Before and after Mars reigns happily.
:
: Many people were looking for worldwide catastophe or such based on this prediction July or September, 1999 (depending on the calendar one implemented). 1999 came and went.
: I would chalk the change of date to 2001 in the translation posted up to another "internet hoax" -- much like the post on GWBush, (when in fact there was no such "IQ" study performed nor does the purported institute that did the study exist).