Re: Return of Mille Update

Re: Return of Mille Update - Please Read

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Forum ]

Posted by IcyIsis (Platinum) (Ranked 66 on Mille Bornes (Games.com) Ladder) on May 10, 2005 at 19:57:12:

In Reply to: Return of Mille Update - Please Read posted by Smurfette () on May 09, 2005 at 08:33:34:

Okay maybe its just me but I do believe we have skeedaddled past annoying and slammed head on into overly ridiculous. It seems to me that the people and Games.com/Atari could have thought to fix the bugs while the new site was still in "beta" testing mode before yanking the old site offline. Sure the old site was quite annoying but a little Mille is better than none at all. We have now been told everything from a few weeks to up to a year. Games.com is the only site that offered Mille and they are well aware of it as they own the rights. Im not sure how popular the arcade games are or were however I do believe it would have been more beneficial to all involved including the patrons of Games.com if they had re written all the popular games first. Mille, Rook, Sorry, Monopoly, Scrabble, etc...and not necessarily in that order but you get my drift. I for one am not happy at all about this and Im sure many share my feelings on this subject.

Isis

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Ladder:
Ladder Name:
Password:
Password saved if checked

Subject:

Comments:
: <font face="pristina" font color="deeppink"> <font size="5">Okay maybe its just me but I do believe we have skeedaddled past annoying and slammed head on into overly ridiculous. It seems to me that the people and Games.com/Atari could have thought to fix the bugs while the new site was still in "beta" testing mode before yanking the old site offline. Sure the old site was quite annoying but a little Mille is better than none at all. We have now been told everything from a few weeks to up to a year. Games.com is the only site that offered Mille and they are well aware of it as they own the rights. Im not sure how popular the arcade games are or were however I do believe it would have been more beneficial to all involved including the patrons of Games.com if they had re written all the popular games first. Mille, Rook, Sorry, Monopoly, Scrabble, etc...and not necessarily in that order but you get my drift. I for one am not happy at all about this and Im sure many share my feelings on this subject. : : Isis</font>

Optional Link URL:

Link Title:

Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Forum ]